Call Us: 040 23299778

Mail Us: hariagarwal@hariagarwalfca.com

 
     
   
 

Important updates

GST Updates

The latest Updates on GST will be uploaded by our Partner CA Vivek Agarwal on Youtube. Please visit www.youtube.com for the videos on GST.

Our Recent Videos on :

 32nd GST Council Meeting 10.01.2019 

 ITC Claim and Rectification on GST extended 

 Difference between GST Annual Return and GST Audit 

 GST Annual Return 


Income Tax Updates

Latest Supreme Court Verdicts

Anil Kumar Nehru vs. ACIT (Supreme Court)


It is a matter of record that on the identical issue raised by the appellant in respect of earlier assessment, the appeal is pending before the High Court. In these circumstances, the High Court should not have taken such a technical view of dismissing the appeal in the instant case on the ground of delay, when it has to decide the question of law between the parties in any case in respect of earlier assessment year. For this reason we set aside the order of the High Court; condone the delay for filing the appeal and direct to decide the appeal on merits.

Council of ICAI vs. Gurvinder Singh (Supreme Court)

The Disciplinary Committee has, on facts, found the Chartered Accountant guilty of a practice which was not in the Chartered Accountant’s professional capacity. This, it was entitled to do under Schedule I Part-IV subclause (2) if, in the opinion of the Council, such act brings disrepute to the profession whether or not related to his professional work.

Sushila N. Rungta vs. TRO (Supreme Court)

The statement of objects and reasons makes it clear that over 22 years, the results achieved under the Act have not been encouraging and the desired objectives for which the Act has been introduced have failed. Following the advice of experts, who have examined issues related to the Act, the objects and reasons goes on further to state that this Act has proved to be a regressive measure which has caused considerable dissatisfaction in the minds of the public and hardship and harassment to artisans and small self-employed goldsmiths.


Latest High Court Verdicts

Saurabh Suryakant Mehta VS ITO (Bombay High Court)

In other words, during the previous reassessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer examined the alleged bogus sales of the assessee, taxed 2.25% thereof as assessee’s additional income and passed the order of assessment accordingly. The Assessing Officer now believes that taxing 2.25% of the sales, was an error and instead the entire amount should have been added to the assessee’s income. This would be a mere change of opinion.

Ankita A Choksey VS ITO (Bombay High Court)

Even in cases where the return of income has been accepted by processing under Section 143(1) of the Act, reopening of an assessment can only be done when the Assessing Officer has reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment. The mere fact that the return has been processed under Section 143(1) of the Act, does not give the Assessing Officer a carte blanc to issue a reopening notice.


Sony Pictures Networks India Pvt Ltd VS ITAT (Bombay High Court)

The Tribunal ignored the fact that the above observation of this Court in Ramesh Electrical (supra) was on the basis that for a rectification application to be maintainable, the mistake should be apparent from the record. In this case, the mistake / error in not dealing with the fundamental submission in appeal is apparent from the record, as the submission that the distribution fee was not royalty was recorded and yet not dealt with in the order.

 

 
     
8579 Times Visited